TO: Phyllis J. Hamilton- Chief District Judge
Claudia Wilken- District Judge
Yvonne Gonzalez Rodgers- Judge
U. S. District Court- No. Division
4th Floor Oakland Courthouse
1301 Clay Street
Oakland, CA 94612
FAX No.: 510-637-3545, 415-522-3605
Phyllis_Hamilton@cand.uscourts.gov
Claudia_Wilken@cand.uscourts.gov
Yvonne_Rodgers@cand.uscourts.gov
cc: Susan Y. Soong ; bcc
Faxed and Emailed
FROM: Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim
DATE: March 13, 2019
NO PAGES: 3
RE: ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim v. Green Key Investments L.L.C., Case: #C19-0303 JSC,
Dear Chief Justice Phyllis Hamilton, Judge Claudia Wilken, and Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rodgers:
On March 11, 2019, I received a second order from Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rodgers
regrading the filing of another “revised application” as follows:
The Court is in receipt of plaintiffs four-page letter dated February 27, 2019. (Dkt. No 14.) Therein, plaintiff appears to complain that the Court is requesting confirmation of his status with respect to his application to proceed in forma pauperis. While the Court is quite aware of the financial circumstances of many in this District, that does not mean that the Court can ignore its duty to ensure that those asking for financial relief provide an explanation, under penalty of perjury, regarding their financial situation. Judge Corley appropriately described the gaps with respect to the information provided, which this Court reiterated in its subsequent order. (See Dkt. No.6, 13.) It is not clear why plaintiff refuses to respond substantively. Plaintiff may submit the information confidentially if that is the concern.”
It goes on to state:
All parties are required to comply with Court orders and rules. Accordingly, the Court will EXTEND, one last time, plaintiff’s deadline to Tuesday, April 2, 2019 to submit a revised application, or enough supplemental information to explain the information gaps set forth in Judge Corley’s and this Court’s orders.’ If plaintiff does not use the Court’s application itself but provides further information in a different form, he is reminded to include the following: “I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and understand that a false statement herein may result in the dismissal of my claims.”
Failure to provide the Court with the information requested will result in the denial of plaintiff s application.
IT Is So ORDERED.
Dated: March 7, 2019
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
It provides as a footnote the “relevant” paragraph from Judge Corley’s order:
Although Plaintiff has listed himself as self-employed, he appears to have listed his income as 00. Further, although he does not list any other income nor any savings nor debt, he identifies his monthly expenditures as $300.00 for utilities. Plaintiff does not indicate any monthly expenses for rent, food, or clothing. Thus, there appear to be several information gaps on Plaintiffs in forma pauperis application. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall submit a revised application by February 7, 2019. If Plaintiff fails to submit a revised application by this date, his application to proceed in forma pauperis may be denied.
(Order re: IFP Application at ECF p. 1 (emphasis supplied).) To date, plaintiff has failed to comply with Judge Corley’s order, and the “information gaps” in his in forma pauperis application remain.
Accordingly, the Court EXTENDS plaintiffs deadline to submit a revised application to Tuesday, March 5, 2019. Failure to submit a revised application by this date may result in the denial of his application.
IT Is So ORDERED.
Dated: February 19, 2019
YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
The original form was submitted under the penalty of perjury, if that was/is the concern, and to be absolutely clear, so is this second letter addressing the same issues raised in the first order, the “flagging” of certain alleged deficiencies as “information gaps” in plaintiffs pending application to proceed in forma pauperis is without any merit and the responses remain the same.
I reiterate in use of your language “Plaintiff listed his income as 00, does not list any other income nor any savings nor debt, he identifies his monthly expenditures as $300.00 for utilities, and does not indicate any monthly expenses for rent, food, or clothing” because that is true and correct and will not change simply because you do not like the answer fishing for another.
These statements ARE sworn under the penalty of perjury, and are NOT impeached because you threaten to dismiss the matter in search of some fraudulent or perjurious information that you could be considered “forcing” upon plaintiff under that “one last time” threat and the accompanying duress.
There is NO need nor requirement, beside the one fabricated here to induce a “revised application, or enough supplemental information” solely for that purpose.
The only legal question is “does plaintiff meet that criterion that is ruled by the financial requirements for IFP status of 28 U.S.C. § 1915?
The esoteric blather about the Legal Help Center, which I have contacted and they can not and do not assist in these matters, is just that.
Again, how does this means of obtaining a filing fee waiver REALLY impact ones ability to represent themselves which is suppose to be the purpose of the form?
It is very disconcerting that the court has taken the approach to this case that it has at present and clearly was embarked upon an agenda that reeks of implicit bias and prejudice, at the very least, already!
As previously mentioned, I will address the previous assignment of this matter by the alleged Executive Committee to Judge Tigar in a following letter as it is unfathomable, heinous, reprehensible, disgraceful, inexcusable, unconscionable, outrageous, nefarious example of “MALFEASANCE”
Who comprises this alleged Executive Committee?
You are ALL being served and I will file this letter with the courts.
Call if you have any questions, and “Thank you” for your consideration.
Respectfully,
I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and understand that a false statement herein may result in the dismissal of my claims.
Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim
510-394-4501
March 13, 2019
Categories: (R), 110 Franklin Street, 1225 Fallon Street Room 209, 1300 I Street, 1301 Clay Street, 2020, 350 McAllister Street, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, 455 Golden Gate Ave, 508 Dimm Street, @cand.uscourts.gov, @doj.ca.gov, @jud.ca.gov, ACLU, African-American, agents, Alameda County, Alameda County district attorney, Alameda County Superior Court, Alameda County Supervisors, alameda.courts.ca.gov, alaska, Alex Tse, Amy Klobuchar, and informants of the U. S. Attorney General- Northern California, Andrew Yang, animus, Anthony Kline, Anthony S. Leung, Appeals court, Associate Justice, Attorney General of California, Author, barack obama, Barbara Valliere, Bay Area Legal Aid, Bernie Sanders, Beth Robbins, Beto O'Rourke, bigotry, Bill de Blasio, Bill of Rights, Bill Weld, Books, Brent Hanson, broadcast, broadcast media, Business, Business and Professions Code, C. Don Clay, C.C.P. §170.1 (a)(6)(A)(iii), california, California Appellate Court, California Attorney General, California Congressperson, California Constitution, California Judges Association, California State Appeals Court, California State Bar Association, California State Senator, California State Supreme Court, California Supreme Court, California Supreme Court Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, candidate, candidate for president, case is fixed, Center for Constitutional Rights, Chad Finke, Chair, challenge for cause, Charles Johnson, charles o’connor, Chief District Judge, Chief Justice, Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, Christopher Leung, CIA, civil rights, Civil Rights Division, Claudia Wilken, Code of Civil Procedure, colluded, Colorado, commercial advertisements, Commission on Judicial Performance, commissioners, conceived, Congress, consorted, contractors, contributions, Corruption, Cory Booker, cover up, criminal entrapment defense litigation strategy, criminal justices, cronyism, CSAA, Culture, David Krashna, Democrats, Dennis Hayashi, deny petition, Department 1, Department 511, Department 518, Department 6, Deputy Clerk, director, Director-Chief Counsel, dog whistle signal, Don Clay, Donald Trump, Due Process of Law, East Bay Community Law Center, Education, elected officials, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Elizabeth Warren, engaged in corruption and conspired, Entertainment, entrepreneur, Equal Justice Society, Eric Swalwell, established and admitted, ethnicity, Evelio Grillo, Events, ex-parte communications between the judges, Executive Officer, expenditures, exploratory committees, F.B.I., Family, Federal Chief District Judge, Federal Courthouse, Federal Election Commission (FEC), federal government, Fifth Amendment, filed multiple complaints, filed to run for president, First District Court of Appeal, florida, forcing appellants into the Appeals Court cemetery for civil rights, former Chief District Judge, former Chief Justice, former governor of Colorado, former U.S. representative, former U.S. secretary of housing and urban development, former vice president of the United States, Frank Roesch, Friends, George Hernandez, Glenn Oleon, governmental, Governor, Governor of California, grand jury, Green Key Investments, hawaii, Henry Needham, History, Homeland Security (NSA), House Judiciary Committee, illegal, illicit ex parte collusion and conspiracy, inciting the courts acrimony, Indiana, Indictment, instituted by the legal system, Insurance, Ioana Petrou, Iran, islam, Islamaphobia, issue orders, James Humes, James Richman, Jay Inslee, Jeffery Brand, Jennifer Madden, Jo-Lynne Lee, Jo-Lynne Q. Lee, Joe Biden, John Delaney, John Hickenlooper, John Wordlaw, Jon Rolefsen, Jon Rolefson, Joseph Spero, joshua Eaton, Judge, Judges, judges do not hesitate to deny or violate a litigants rights and defy them to file a writ, judicial administrative, Judicial Appointments, judicial calumny deceit, Judicial Council, Judicial Council of California, Julia Spain, Julián Castro, Justice Department, Justices Jones, Kamala Harris, Kathleen Banke, Kelli Evans, Kevin R. Murphy, Kimberly Colwell, Kirsten Gillibrand, Laura Stuber, Law, law enforcement and legal entities employees, LCCR, lecturer, Leo Dorado, Life, Marianne Williamson, Marina Soto, Martin Hoshino, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mayor, Mayor of Oakland, McCarthyism, Michael Bennet, Michael Markman, Michelle Obama, Mike Gravel, Mike Markman, Minnesota, Miramar, miscarriage of justice, mockery of justice, Montana, Morris Jacobson, Movies, Music, muslims, National Coalition to Protect Civil Freedoms, natural-born citizen of the United States, New Jersey, new york, new york city, News, Notable declared candidates, notable public figures, Oakland, Oakland City Attorney, Oakland City Councilpersons, Ohio, ORDERS OF SELF DISQUALIFICATION, other judicial, Outlawed, People, persecution, Personal, pervasive, Pete Buttigieg, Phyllis J. Hamilton, Politics, Presiding Judge, pursuant to C.C.P. §170.1 (a)(6)(A)(ii), RACKET, racketeering, radio, railroaded by the court, Rand, recused, register, registered presidential candidates, regulatory agencies, Rene C. Davidson Courthouse, Rep. John Conyers, representative, Republicans, resident of the United States, Richard Wieking, Robert Freedman, Robert Wilson, Ronald M. George, Ronni MacLaren, Rule of Law is Overruled, Rules of Professional Conduct, running for president, Sacramento, San Antonio mayor, san francisco, Sandra Margulies, sara Winslow, Sarah Hanson, Scott Patton, Sean McCluskie, Senate Judiciary, senator, Seth Moulton, South Bend, Southern Poverty Law Center, stacey geis, State and Federal, Stephan Kaus, Stephan Pulido, Stephen Kaus, Steve Bullock, Sue Alexander, Superior Court, Superior Court Administration, Superior Court judges, superior court judges have conspired with the appellant courts, Superior Court of Alameda County, Supervising Judge, Supreme Court of California, Tani Cantil-Sakauye, Tara Desautels, television, Terence Bruiniers, terrorism, texas, the death of due process, the dumpster for denial, the homicide of human rights, the treason of truth, third parties, Tim Ryan, trial, Tulsi Gabbard, U. S. District Court- No. Division, U.S. Attorney's Office, U.S. senator from, U.S. Supreme Court, United States Constitution, US Attorney, USC Gould School Of Law, usdoj.gov, Victoria B. Henley, Wayne Messam, Western Center On Law & Poverty, where justice is a miscarriage, where litigants rights are banished to rot in oppression, Winifred Smith, WRIT, WRIT RACKET, Wynne Carville, Xavier Becerra, YNorthridge@alameda.courts.ca.gov, Yolanda Northridge . Tags: (D), (R), 2020, alaska, Amy Klobuchar, Andrew Yang, Author, barack obama, Bernie Sanders, Beto O'Rourke, Bill de Blasio, Bill Weld, california, candidate, candidate for president, Colorado, contributions, Cory Booker, Democrats, Donald Trump, elected officials, Elizabeth Warren, entrepreneur, Eric Swalwell, expenditures, exploratory committees, Federal Election Commission (FEC), filed to run for president, florida, former governor of Colorado, former U.S. representative, former U.S. secretary of housing and urban development, former vice president of the United States, Governor, hawaii, Indiana, Jay Inslee, Joe Biden, John Delaney, John Hickenlooper, Julián Castro, Kamala Harris, Kirsten Gillibrand, lecturer, Marianne Williamson, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mayor, Michael Bennet, Michelle Obama, Mike Gravel, Minnesota, Miramar, Montana, natural-born citizen of the United States, New Jersey, new york, new york city, Notable declared candidates, notable public figures, Ohio, Pete Buttigieg, presidential election, register, registered presidential candidates, representative, Republicans, resident of the United States, running for president, San Antonio mayor, senator, Seth Moulton, South Bend, Steve Bullock, texas, Tim Ryan, Tulsi Gabbard, U.S. senator from, Vermont, Washington, Wayne Messam . Author: NOWTRUTH . Comments: Leave a comment