Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim’s Complaint and Investigation Request Wellpoint Asset Recovery and MARTHA BRONITSKY Bankruptcy Case: #18-40567

TO:        Alex Tse                           Phyllis J. Hamilton
Director- No. District                    Chief District Judge
U. S. Attorney’s Office                  U. S. District Court- No. Division
Federal Courthouse                     6th Floor Oakland Courthouse- 2
450 Golden Gate Avenue            1301 Clay Street
San Francisco, CA 94102             Oakland, CA 94612
Fax No.: 415-436-7234                FAX No.: 415-522-3605
alex.Tse@usdoj.gov                       Phyllis_Hamilton@cand.uscourts.gov
stacey.geis@usdoj.gov                  Richard_Wieking@cand.uscourts.gov
joshua.Eaton@usdoj.gov              Joseph_Spero@cand.uscourts.gov

Chief Judge Roger L. Efrensky               Martha G. Bronitsky
William Lafferty                                        Trustee
Office of the United States Trustee       P.O. Box 5004
1301 Clay Street, Room 690N                Hayward, CA 94540
Oakland, CA 94612                                  Fax: 510-266-5589
Fax: 510-637-3220                                 vsilveira@oak13.com
Roger_Efrensky@cand.uscourts.gov
William_Lafferty@cand.uscourts.gov

Xavier Becerra                                           Tracy Hope Davis
Attorney General of California                 Office of the United States Trustee
1300 I Street, Suite 125                            450 Golden Gate Ave,Ste #05-0153
P.O. Box 944255                                       San Francisco, CA 94102
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550                 Fax: 415-705-3379
FAX No.: 916-324-8835                          Tracy_Davis@cand.uscourts.gov
Xavier.Becerra@doj.ca.gov
Peter.Southworth@doj.ca.gov
Robert.Wilson@doj.ca.gov

cc: ; bcc
cc: Clerk Edward J. Emmons ; bcc
Faxed and Emailed
FROM:     Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim
DATE:     April 18, 2018
NO PAGES: 6 + 3 attachments
RE:        Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim’s Intention to Proceed with Bankruptcy Case: #18-40567 RLE

Dear Chief Judge Roger L. Efrensky, Martha Bronitsky, Alex Tse, Phyllis J. Hamilton, Xavier Becerra, and Tracy Hope Davis:

I received a letter dated March 29, 2018, from Ianthe V. del Rosario, Legal Assistant at the Office of the United States Trustee in response to my fax of the day before.

The letter DOES NOT EVEN MENTION MARTHA BRONITSKY, her theft of my money paid to her in her official fiduciary capacity as a trustee, is without action, non committal, and intentionally vague so as to suggest that your office will do absolutely NOTHING which is to be expected, and I may NEVER be contacted nor be informed of anything!

As I stated in my first letter, I filed a complaint in this matter with Mark L. Pope, Linda Ekstrom-Stanley, and Carol Roth among others, wherein it was just covered-up!

With this letter response from Ms. del Rosario, it appears that this must be the culture of the Office of the United States Trustee, to covered up these criminal activities! It offers NO attempt at even alluding to any transparent action being taken, quite the contrary, it totally avoids holding anyone accountable, even pending this charade of an “investigation”. THAT WILL NOT BE TOLERATED, DISCIPLINARY ACTION MUST BE TAKEN ON THE RECORD!

Times have changed dramatically from the days when corruption, specially government enforced corruption, could be “covered-up and hushed-up”, in this new-world of open government, whistle blowers, activist, and demands of accountability are celebrated! You can’t get away with it!!

I never received any answer to how the correspondence from the court/trustee was ALL dated on the same date, postmarked on the same date, and use that date as the time certain for the responses to all the filings that are due to began. Starting a “running clock”.

This is some what startling since those documents were not mailed by the court/trustee on that dateand I received them two weeks later simultaneously with very little time to prepare ALL those responses to the 106, 107 series forms required to be completed from the date of the correspondence. I had to find where the forms were, get them and some advise/help with them.

It takes longer to assemble all the data that is required and do so trying to be precise and inclusive then I was able to have in this case, less than two weeks.

Since these documents were handled by Bronitsky, I can assume that had some impact on the process, perhaps how it was expedited!

Bronitsky, for some reason recently filed a request with the courts and was placed on the service list as a noticed party in an unrelated Superior Court case, al-Hakim vs AT&T, case #:RG17-881130. Why? (see attached proof of service)

I can suggest with certainty that it has some involvement with the Wellpoint Asset Recovery creditor as this alleged debt was procured through fraud that is continuing!

Wellpoint attorney, John Bradley recently admitted in the Appeals Court that he “paid” the County Sheriff’s $1,500 to ensure that the planned house auction took place and to report to him any activities on my part.

Wellpoint Asset Recovery, a $600,000 creditor with designs on selling my home at Sheriff’s auction, wherein they can buy it for a fraction of the value, obtain the asset, and still be owed the debt!

Yet ALL Bankruptcy Court correspondence sent to them at the address of their registered agent and business partner, Colin Hammett, at 4470 W. Sunset Blvd. #91234, Los Angeles, CA 90027, has been returned, “unknown recipient”! (see attached letter)

At the January 22, 2018, hearing Mr. Bradley attempted to “quash” the subpoena served on Mr. Lanni and his myriad of connected companies including Wellpoint, before.

Those connected companies include but not limited to School Trust #1321, Sunkist Trust #7633, Housing Group Fund Corporation, Trustors Security Deed Service, Eurisko Development, Wellpoint Asset Recovery LLC and Dennis Lanni, with his partners Andre Scott, Deanna Montgomery, Colin Hammett, and Ken Madhvani, among others are the SAME entity assigned the lien by CSAA.

They filed documents in Alameda County Recorders that were forgeries and fraudulent in an effort to foreclose on the property and attempted several proposed auctions of the home from the Alameda County Courthouse steps in Oakland, CA.

One forged document had “Jerline Wallace”and her alleged court appointment as “Trustee”for Clyde Wallace, that raised questions of “what was she appointed to do, why was she appointed, when was she appointed, where was she appointed, how was she appointed and by whom?”

There were even more questions about the alleged “Sunkist Trust #7633”, “who really comprises this trust, what type of business entity is it under the laws of the State of California, why was it formed, when was it formed, where was it formed, how was it formed and by whom?”

We made several requests under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (15 U.S.C. § 1692, et seq.) and the Rosenthal Act (Civil Code § 1788, et seq.) and that the written responses to my requests of August 29, 2016 and September 14, 2016 were due from them no later than September 29, 2016. They failed and refused to comply with the noticed demand Pursuant to California Civil Code § 1788.52.

I had Joseph Jaramillo, Senior Attorney at the Housing And Economic Rights Advocates and National Association of Consumer Advocates (NACA) send two letters to them asking them to validate the debt. They failed and refused to respond.

During the course of this effort to collect on their “deed of trust”, Lanni admits that as the “500 pound elephant in the room!” he offered an illegal predatory loan of over $$440.000 (to cover the $300, 000 CSAA lien and his claimed $140,000 lien) to enable himself to swindle me into giving him value to his worthless deed that he lured the others into joining him as he told them “he (al-Hakim) doesn’t have an attorney and no one will work with him, so we can take the property!”

He made this illegal predatory loan offer to Mr. Jaramillo as well as to me.

When I asked him to verify that he indeed had the CSAA lien from Ropers Majeski and Stephan Barber, he said he did but would not provide proof of it.

Mr Lanni was trying to secure an illegal predatory loan from me at the same time he was operating as the collector and assignee of the CSAA lien and this was confirmed by Mr. Bradley!

Mr. Lanni had previously tried to engage me in buying the property.

This “group/groups” formed an action in the probate Estate of Wallace, Clyde, Defendants- Case No. P047803 and FPR047803.

On May 11, 2017, I sent a 4 page letter to Judge Alesia Jones of Solano County Court regarding this probate opened by Lanni to try to secure some value in the alleged deeds that he knew were invalid.

I have filed several Civil Collection Agency Elder Abuse complaints with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau- case number: 160926-000033; California Attorney General, the California Office of Business Oversight (DBO)- case number: 161003-000872

The parties have always failed and refused to respond to any “government secured channel” inquiry regarding the matter and as such when they did so with the Attorney General and Office of Business Oversight, the case was referred to the Federal Communication Commission for a broader Federal investigation that is ongoing at present.

The parties, ALL of them, including CSAA and Mr. Bradley have committed such tortious acts they have put their entire lien AND professional careers in jeopardy!

ALL this information is critical to the issues plead and CAN NOT be obtained otherwise, as they have evaded providing this to the Sate and Federal Government!

Recently, Wellpoint filed a motion with the court to declare the bankruptcy stay “void” claiming that I had filed several times, wherein Judge Efrensky denied that motion since the matter had been dismissed. Wellpoint then immediately went back to the sheriff’s to file their action to sell the home at auction again that is scheduled for May 4, 2018.

What is NOT noted is that each time I filed the Chapter 13, it was assigned to Bronitsky!

I just can’t have Ms. Bronitsky’s presence in this case since she has previously issued me checks drawn on her business account that have bounced for insufficient funds and others that had stopped payments applied to them of $9,889.04, I do not feel comfortable going forward with her as a trustee.

We have been assembling the necessary data to go forward with the filing to resolution and intend to contest the alleged debts of:

CSAA-Wellpoint Asset Recovery as this alleged debt was procured through fraud that is continuing;
USDOJ as this alleged debt was paid in 1978;
National Collection Agency as we DO NOT KNOW who they represent and we have issued debt buyers demands upon them and they have failed and refused to respond;
Alliance Credit/Bank 1, T. Miller as this alleged debt was procured through fraud and recently dismissed in court;
We are still investigating other claims and liens.

I want ALL of you served with this letter to consider this a complaint and investigation request relate to the existence and collection of the alleged debt by Wellpoint, counsel Bradley and Lanni that the government has found was illegal and may void the alleged debt.Lanni has admitted that he tried for years to recover on an illegal alleged debt that included his attempt to sell the home in question several times as an alleged “foreclosure” on the Oakland courthouse steps and as part of this strategy to bring value to the illegal alleged debt, he offered a predatory loan to attempt to move into “first position” with a new mortgage to cover the alleged $300,000 CSAA debt and $130,000 for the illegal alleged debt. He did this even AFTER he was aware that the government agencies were trying to apprehend him for these illegal activities.

This complaint and investigation request include the fraud upon the court that defendants CSAA-Wellpoint committed when they failed and refused to reveal the fact that they were aware of the Homestead on the property, the value of the District Attorney liens on the property, and the contamination in the home TWENTY YEARS BEFORE their alleged home appraisal yet there is NO reference to any contamination in it as if it would NOT have any value in determining the fair market value of that appraisal used in the Order to Show Cause for Sale of Dwelling in January 2018. This fraud upon the court is very clear when they knew that their own experts testified that it would cost over $350,000 to remediate just the lower level of the home in 1997! CSAA’s costs for the entire home was $700,000 and was nearly the same as al-Hakim’s experts $700,000. This is part of the Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim v. California State Automobile Association Inter-Insurance Bureau. et al., Alameda County Superior Court Case No. 811337-3, and in Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim v. Rescue Industries, Alameda County Superior Court Case No. 821885-2 cases.

I would NOT be filing the petition if it were not for this claimed debt that was procured through fraud!

Again, I simply want to reiterate and make plain that I have every intention of completing my bankruptcy petition and discharging the debt even if I have to refile it.

Again, I ask the court/trustee/authorities MUST review the theft of my money in the Wong case, compensate me for my loses, and change it’s assignment of this case to Bronitsky and make a more proper assignment in the future.

You are ALL being served and I will file this letter with the courts.

Call if you have any questions, and “Thank you” for your consideration.

Respectfully,

Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim
510-394-4501

Advertisements

Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim’s Intention to Proceed with Bankruptcy Case: #18-40567

TO:        Alex Tse                           Phyllis J. Hamilton
Director- No. District                    Chief District Judge
U. S. Attorney’s Office                  U. S. District Court- No. Division
Federal Courthouse                     6th Floor Oakland Courthouse- 2
450 Golden Gate Avenue            1301 Clay Street
San Francisco, CA 94102             Oakland, CA 94612
Fax No.: 415-436-7234                FAX No.: 415-522-3605
alex.Tse@usdoj.gov                       Phyllis_Hamilton@cand.uscourts.gov
stacey.geis@usdoj.gov                  Richard_Wieking@cand.uscourts.gov
joshua.Eaton@usdoj.gov              Joseph_Spero@cand.uscourts.gov

Chief Judge Roger L. Efrensky               Martha G. Bronitsky
William Lafferty                                        Trustee
Office of the United States Trustee       P.O. Box 5004
1301 Clay Street, Room 690N                Hayward, CA 94540
Oakland, CA 94612                                  Fax: 510-266-5589
Fax: 510-637-3220                                 vsilveira@oak13.com
Roger_Efrensky@cand.uscourts.gov
William_Lafferty@cand.uscourts.gov

Xavier Becerra                                           Tracy Hope Davis
Attorney General of California                 Office of the United States Trustee
1300 I Street, Suite 125                            450 Golden Gate Ave,Ste #05-0153
P.O. Box 944255                                       San Francisco, CA 94102
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550                 Fax: 415-705-3379
FAX No.: 916-324-8835                          Tracy_Davis@cand.uscourts.gov
Xavier.Becerra@doj.ca.gov
Peter.Southworth@doj.ca.gov
Robert.Wilson@doj.ca.gov

cc: ; bcc
cc: Clerk Edward J. Emmons ; bcc
Faxed and Emailed
FROM:     Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim
DATE:     April 3, 2018
NO PAGES: 2
RE:        Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim’s Intention to Proceed with Bankruptcy Case: #18-40567

Dear Chief Judge Roger L. Efrensky, Martha Bronitsky, Alex Tse, Phyllis J. Hamilton, Xavier Becerra, and Tracy Hope Davis:

It was good to briefly speak with Ms Davis today, and simply want to reiterate and make plain that I have every intention of completing my bankruptcy petition and discharging the debt even if I have to refile it.

I would NOT be filing the petition if it were not for the claimed debts that were procured through fraud!

I am some what concerned how the correspondence from the court/trustee was ALL dated on the same date, postmarked on the same date, and use that date as the time certain for the responses to all the filings that are due to began. Starting a “running clock”.

This is some what startling since those documents were not mailed by the court/trustee on that date and I received them with very little time to prepare ALL those responses to the 106, 107 series forms required to be completed from the date of the correspondence. I had to find where the forms were, get them and some advise/help with them.

It takes longer to assemble all the data that is required and do so trying to be precise and inclusive then I was able to have in this case.

Again, I have every intention of completing my bankruptcy petition even if I have to refile it.

I just can’t have Ms. Bronitsky’s presence in this case since she has previously issued me checks drawn on her business account that have bounced for insufficient funds and others that had stopped payments applied to them of $9,889.04, I do not feel comfortable going forward with her as a trustee.

The court/trustee MUST review the theft of my money in the Wong case, compensate me for my loses, and change it’s assignment of this case to Bronitsky and make a more proper assignment in the future.

You are ALL being served and I will file this letter with the courts.

Call if you have any questions, and “Thank you” for your consideration.

Respectfully,

Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim
510-394-4501

Plaintiff Opposition to any Tentative Ruling Issued by Judge Clay;Alleged denial of Challenge by Judge Clay; Reply by defendant Equinix

TO:  Judge Carvill
Judge Markman
Judge Clay
René C. Davidson Courthouse
Superior Court of Alameda County
Department 1
Department 6
Department 15
1225 Fallon Street
Oakland CA 94612
Fax: (510) 267-1567
Fax: (510) 891-6276
dept.1@alameda.courts.ca.gov,WCarvill@alameda.courts.ca.gov,
dept.15@alameda.courts.ca.gov,CClay@alameda.courts.ca.gov
MMarkman@alameda.courts.ca.gov

Case No.: RG18888371
Plaintiff’s Opposition to Judge C. Don Clay being assigned this case for all purposes
Hearing: CMC
Hearing Date: May 24, 2018
Time: 3:00 p.m.
Location: Rene C. Davidson Courthouse
1225 Fallon Street
Oakland CA 94612
Department 6

Faxed and Emailed
FROM:     Abdul-Jalil
DATE:      March 22, 2018
RE:           Plaintiff’s Unavailability and Opposition to an Alleged Vexatious Litigant Proceeding and CMC, Case No.: RG18888371.

Dear Judges Clay, Carvill, and Markman:

In the Dred Scott decision Chief Justice Taney wrote, blacks had been “regarded as beings of an inferior order” with “no rights which the white man was bound to respect.”!

Herein is Plaintiff Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim’s notice of Opposition to any Tentative Ruling Issued by Judge Clay; receipt of an alleged denial of Challenge for Cause by Judge Clay on Saturday, March 31, 2018; and a reply by defendant Equinix to an alleged Vexatious Litigant Motion on March 31, 2018.

Plaintiff herein files this standing Opposition to any Tentative Ruling Issued by Judge Clay in this or any other matter that he might issue.
He has issued an order ALREADY deeming me a Vexatious Litigant in a proceeding yet to be heard and REFUSING to have that hearing on a date I can attend, yet DEMANDING the hearing be on a date I can NOT attend due to religious commitments that has been known to the defendants and the court for over 30 years!

Clays Alleged Denial of Challenge for Cause
Judge Clay was NEVER served a challenge, whether he would like to treat any document filed and/or served on him or the court as such is merely an attempt to further his and the courts unfortunate, agenda of denying me justice.

When and if I file a challenge, he will know it!

My filings with the court relative to Clay was an attempt to address the humanity and fairness of due process and justice, and when it is denied, to acknowledge it and hold those whom have violated those premises to be held accountable.

It was an opportunity for Clay to accept his involvement in the many issues I have addressed over the years and just quietly move away from the light being shined on the many illegal atrocities continuing to date that are still outstanding and unresolved!

The judges mentioned have exhibited clear and gross examples of white class and privileged bias, prejudice, islamophobia, xenaphobia, hate induced, vindictive, retaliatory agenda, favoritism, bigotry and racism; repeatedly advocated imprimaturs of the plaintiffs litigation theory; voiced a negative and derogatory opinion of al-Hakim; portrayed al-Hakim a liar and when he could not prove it he tried to create the lie that in his sole judgment is a lie in order to justify his calling al-Hakim a “liar”; exhibited bad faith and deceit; denied al-Hakim’s civil and human rights, the rights to the truth, justice, to evidence and testimony, to due process; has had illegal ex-parte communications regarding al-Hakim even through third parties; highjacked the hearings with criminal intent under the color of law and authority in violation of the Unruh and Bane Acts. These efforts of the judges can qualify as a Hate Crime under the Unruh and Ralph Civil Rights and the Bane Acts, while they are clear acts of religious bigotry and intolerance for which al-Hakim will not allow.

This is vitally important because this court and the judges herein mentioned have a history of corruption and repeatedly violating plaintiff’s rights under the First, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; First Clause of Section 13 of Article I of California State Constitution and/or covering it up!

On March 29, 2018, I had to file another complaint with Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye, Judges Jacobson, Rolefson, Carvill, Colwell, Krashna, Clay, Lee, Murphy, Smith, Patton, Pulido, Grillo, Markman and Carvill, Alex Tse, Phyllis Hamilton, Ms. Henley, Mr. Finke, Mr. Hoshino and OTHERS, regarding the continued corruption of this court cartel, the “COURTEL”.

Equinix to an alleged Vexatious Litigant Motion
With regards to a reply served by defendant Equinix to an alleged Vexatious Litigant Motion I received on March 31, 2018, I will NOT attempt to respond to it since I was NEVER served any motion to begin with.

As I said before, I have never been involved in and there are NO prior orders from ANY court that deems me a vexatious litigant!

As mentioned in the denied request “What prior orders does the court have regarding this case or myself that could possibly have any bearing on this case when NOTHING has been filed in this case but my summons and subpoena which the defendants have defaulted on?”

This is a fabricated motion to allow the court an opportunity to enact it’s motive to impose unjust measures on my litigation and destroy any remote chance of justice in my cases.

How is the justice system that you run in this county allowed to deny an application for a fee waiver because an unknown motion is “pending”? So am I to understand that YOUR system is guilty before a hearing on this meritless motion is even heard?

Is that NOT a major violation of the Constitution and my basic civil right to innocence before PROVEN guilty??!!!

THIS MOTION SHOULD BE DROPPED IMMEDIATELY AND SANCTIONS ORDERED ON THE PARTY THAT FILED THIS FRIVOLOUS MOTION!

This motion is scheduled for Friday, April 6, 2018 as well as the CMC scheduled for Thursday, May 24, 2018.
The defendants and the court has been on notice for over 30 years that I have a long standing religious obligations that conflict with scheduled dates on Thursdays and Fridays making it impossible for me to attend any proceedings those days.

I am NOT available on either April 6, nor May 24, 2018 and CAN NOT attend.

I previously requested that the court continue those dates while I am available on any Monday or Wednesday even on April 4, 2018, at 10 AM since I will be in court that morning in another department and May 23, 2018.

While I have NOT been served any documents from anyone in this case and these issues have NOT been subject to any prior litigation, it is NOT possible that I could be deemed a vexatious litigant!

The court has failed and refused to respond, and with their scheduling seeking an uncontested order, thereby making their agenda of finding me a vexatious litigant in this matter, where I have NEVER been served ANY motion papers, apparent to all!

As mentioned we will be presenting a motion to compel the answers to the summons, requests for production of documents and subpoena as we had intended to serve our first amended complaint AFTER receiving the responses that were due a month ago. The defendants have defaulted on both issues.

This is a complaint against my internet server host for 8 years of abusesthat includes but not limited to blocking our web server, ALL incoming and outgoing email, websites and website traffic to censor, suppress, conceal and cover up our exposing their corruption with charges of Fraud, Negligence, Censorship, Misrepresentation, Defect in Product, Breach of Contract, Breach of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing, Breach of Express Warranty, Breach of Implied Warranty, Deceptive Trade Practices, Intentional Misrepresentation, Negligent Misrepresentation, Fraud by Concealment, California’s Unfair Competition Law, Cal Bus & Prof Code §§ 17200 et seq, Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress, Discrimination in Violation of the Unruh Act, Nuisance, Abuse of Process, Fraud by Concealment, Violation of California False Advertising Law, Violation of California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), Breach of Implied Warranty, Deceit, Unfair and Deceptive Business Practices (UDAP), Unconscionability, California FDCPA (Rosenthal Act), Violation of Uniform Trade Secrets Act (UTSA), Elder Abuse, among others.

They are in a daily operation of mounting more and more damages as they have refused and failed to mitigate their damages from 8 years of the above tortious actions!

I have sent this notice via fax and email to the following parties: dept.14@alameda.courts.ca.gov,dept.6@alameda.courts.ca.gov, WCarvill@alameda.courts.ca.gov,MMarkham@alameda.courts.ca.gov, CClay@alameda.courts.ca.gov, fax: 510-267-1567, 510-891-6276, Interserver Inc, Equinix (US) Enterprises Inc, Michael  Lavrik, mike@interserver.net, John Quaglieri, john@interserver.net, fax: 201-526-6605, Anna Hsia, fax: 415-636-5965, anna@zwillgen.com, kmostofizadeh@equinix.com,bgalvin@equinix.com

CONCLUSION
I request that this charade of vexatious litigant motion be dismissed and judge Clay recuse himself from this case and address the appeals issues presented and address the continued corruption and persecution I, my family, businesses, and communities we serve continue to suffer at your individual and collective gavels.

Respectfully submitted,

Date: April 2, 2018

Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim
Plaintiff

510-394-4501

Chad Finke’s Illegal Appeal’s Court Dismissal for Failure to Complete Designation of Record

TO:  Judge Michael Markman          Judge Kim Colwell
Judge Wynne Carvill                        Judge Jeff Brand
Judge Kim Colwell                            Superior Court of Alameda County
Judge Jon Rolefsen                          Departments 511 and 507
Judge Evelio Grillo                             Hayward Hall of Justice
Judge Morris Jacobson                    24405 Amador Street
Judge C. Don Clay                             Hayward, CA 94544
Judge Winifred Smith                       FAX #: 510-690-2824
Judge Yolanda Northridge
Judge Stephen Pulido
Judge Jo-Lynne Q. Lee
Judge Kevin R. Murphy
Superior Court of Alameda County
Departments 1, and 511
René C. Davidson Courthouse
1225 Fallon Street
Oakland CA 94612
FAX #: 510-891-5304, 510-891-6276, 510-267-1567
WCarvill@alameda.courts.ca.gov,dept.1@alameda.courts.ca.gov,JBrand@alameda.courts.ca.gov,KColwell@alameda.courts.ca.gov,dept.507@alameda.courts.ca.gov,MMarkman@alameda.courts.ca.gov,JRolefsen@alameda.courts.ca.gov,EGrillo@alameda.courts.ca.gov,MJacobson@alameda.courts.ca.gov,CClay@alameda.courts.ca.gov,WSmith@alameda.courts.ca.gov, KMurphyalameda.courts.ca.gov, JLee@alameda.courts.ca.gov,YNorthridge@alameda.courts.ca.gov,

Chad Finke                                      Judge Lesley Holland
Executive Officer                            Superior Court of San Joaquin County
Superior Court of California          Departments 31and 12
County of Alameda                        Stockton Courthouse
1225 Fallon Street Room 209       222 E. Weber Avenue
Oakland, CA 94612                        Stockton, California 95202
Fax: 510-891-6276                        Fax: (209) 992-5667
cfinke@alameda.courts.ca.gov

Martin Hoshino                                  Victoria B. Henley
Director                                              Director-Chief Counsel
Judicial Council of California           Commission on Judicial Performance
455 Golden Gate Avenue                 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 14400
San Francisco, CA 94102-3688      San Francisco, CA 94102-3688
FAX NO. 415-865-4586                   FAX NO. (415) 557-1266
Martin.Hoshino@jud.ca.gov             Victoria.Henley@jud.ca.gov
John.Wordlaw@jud.ca.gov

Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye             Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye
Chair, Judicial Council of California           Supreme Court of California
Comm. Judicial Appointments                   350 McAllister Street, Room 1295
455 Golden Gate Ave.                                 San Francisco, CA 94102-4797
San Francisco, CA 94102                            Fax: (415) 865-7181
Fax: 415-865-4200,415-865-4205          Tani.Cantil-Sakauye@jud.ca.gov

Alex Tse                                        Phyllis J. Hamilton
Director- No. District                   Chief District Judge
U. S. Attorney’s Office                 U. S. District Court- No. Division
Federal Courthouse                     6th Floor Oakland Courthouse- 2
450 Golden Gate Avenue           1301 Clay Street
San Francisco, CA 94102           Oakland, CA 94612
Fax No.: (415) 436-7234            FAX No.: 415 522-3605
alex.Tse@usdoj.gov                    Phyllis_Hamilton@cand.uscourts.gov
stacey.geis@usdoj.gov                Richard_Wieking@cand.uscourts.gov
joshua.Eaton@usdoj.gov            Joseph_Spero@cand.uscourts.gov
charles.oconnor@usdoj.gov

Xavier Becerra
Attorney General of California
1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255
Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
FAX No.: (916) 324-8835
Xavier.Becerra@doj.ca.gov
Peter.Southworth@doj.ca.gov
Robert.Wilson@doj.ca.gov

Faxed and Emailed bcc:
FROM:     Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim
DATE:     April 2, 2018
NO PAGES: 3 +  4 page Filed stamped copy of Designation of Record on Appeal Form
RE:        Appellant al-Hakim’s Letter regarding Chad Finke’s Illegal Appeal’s Court Dismissal for Failure to Complete Designation of Record on Appeal, Rule of Court 8.130, al-HAKIM VS CSAA- Wellpoint, Alameda County Superior Court Case: #C811337, California Appeals Court Case# 153640, California Supreme Court Case# S-247169

In the Dred Scott decision Chief Justice Taney wrote, blacks had been “regarded as beings of an inferior order” with “no rights which the white man was bound to respect.”
This fact is live and well in this complaint as practiced by those who’s conduct demonstrate it unmercifully!

Dear Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye, Judges Jacobson, Rolefson, Carvill, Colwell, Krashna, Clay, Lee, Murphy, Smith, Patton, Pulido, Grillo, Markman and Carvill, Alex Tse, Phyllis Hamilton, Ms. Henley, Mr. Finke, Mr. Hoshino and OTHERS:

On Saturday, March 31, 2018, I received a letter from the Appeals Court dated March 27, 2018, stating that my appeal in the above case is dismissed for failure to cure the default of not filing the designation of record on appeal form.

The letter states that on February 22, 2018, the court notified me of the default and the case could be dismissed if it was not cured. It also states that on March 12, 2018 Chad Finke of the superior court issued a certificate opining that I had failed to remedy the default within the time allowed by law.

The document requested was provided to the appeals clerk in the Oakland office when I filed the appeal on February 12, 2018, including an additional, more exhaustive designation of the record filed on pleading paper.The clerk returned the designation of record form because it was on the form for “limited” cases. Later that day I sent the correct form to her and three others in the appeals office via email as she requested.

I went to the Oakland appeals office to get a filed stamped copy of the document and the same clerk (can’t discern what her name is from her signature) informed me then that she had received the completed designation of record form but could not file it because it was emailed. She had no answer when I asked her why she requested me to email it if she wasn’t going to file it. She said that she had the filed stamped written version of the designation of record and printed out a copy for me.

I returned to the Oakland office and filed the completed designation of record form and received a filed stamped copy on March 8, 2018, a copy of which is attached that I sent to Ms. Annie Reasoner and Mr. Charles Johnson of the Appeals court via fax email (ann.reasoner@jud.ca.gov, (Charles.Johnson@jud.ca.gov).

I have no idea why this case has been dismissed when I submitted the document requested and would like the default cured, and an answer to that question.

It seems that this is just another example of the continuing fraud at the hand of Chad Finke whom has been served at least 3 subpoenas and request for production of documents, and 7 other request that has been made of the Court to respond under California Rules of Court 10.500, FOIA, Brown Act- California Public Records Act Request (PRA), and Ethics Complaints with NO RESPONSE from the court nor the court administration, as well as the Judicial Council and Commission on Judicial Performance with the same non response.

Given that we have had no response from these authorities refusing to comply with the subpoenas and administrative requests, I have no choice but to file actions with the responsible agencies to discover this information and resolve the legal concerns expressed for years.

Call if you have any questions, and “Thank you” for your consideration.

Respectfully,

ABDUL-JALIL al-HAKIM
510-394-4501

  • Calendar of Posts

    April 2018
    S M T W T F S
    « Mar   May »
    1234567
    891011121314
    15161718192021
    22232425262728
    2930  
  • Purchase SUPERSTAR MANAGEMENT Lecture Series

    Lecture Series Purchase Prices
    Lecture Series Discount Offer $50.00 USD Lecture Series CD Special $99.00 USD Lecture Series DVD Special $149.00 USD Lecture Series CD Standard Discount $199.00 USD Lecture Series DVD Standard Discount $399.00 USD Lecture Series CD Standard $450.00 USD Lecture Series DVD Standard $750.00 USD
  • RSS Abdul-Jalil Lecture Series

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • Please Support AMWFT Efforts with Your Secure Paypal Sponsorship Donation

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 3 other followers

  • SUPERSTARMANAGEMENT’S iTUNES Podcast’s

  • ABC-TV Breaking News

    [clearspring_widget title="abc7news.com: news, weather & video" wid="4921ce44d2cc0f1e" pid="4a4c63c6d26c3e46" width="304" height="254" domain="widgets.clearspring.com"]
  • Now Truth! Twitter Roll

    Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.