Grand, Systemic and Endemic Corruption in California Appeals Court and California Supreme Court

TO:        Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye
Associate Justices of the Court
Supreme Court of California
350 McAllister Street, Room 1295
San Francisco, CA 94102-4797

FROM: Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim
DATE: May 3, 2019 
NO PAGES: 8
RE: Grand, Systemic and Endemic Corruption, Annual Retreat for Ramadan, Green Key Investments v. al-Hakim, CASE NO.: RGI8927213, in related California Appeals Court Case NO: 156677, and California Supreme Court Case.

Dear Chief Justice Cantil-Sakauye, and Justices of the Courts:

I am filing this appeal on the last day before I go into my annual retreat for the Holy Month of Ramadan from May 3, 2019 until June 14, 2019 and will be unable and unavailable to respond to any litigation. I have previously noticed the Court and I have already notified the parties.

The petition is properly and technically formatted to court specifications and timely filed to prevent any delays and everything is current in the above matter. If there is any defect in the filing, I will be unable to cure it until I return, so I would ask the court to consider, on it’s own motion, a stay in proceedings if that is the case.

As always, I am available on any Monday or Wednesday thereafter.

I want to notify the courts and the parties of my retreat and the need for a continuance or “stay of actions” during this time.

However, I am aware that the Superior Court administration and judges have been working with law enforcement trying to entrap, frame and incriminate me in criminal activity that is fostered by the hearings in these cases that are selectively being recorded by the court reporter whom arbitrarily goes on and off the record at the judges silent instruction, thereby editing the proceedings while in progress!

This is continuing the atmosphere of intolerable TERROR in furtherance of the judges, the courts, and opposing parties corruption and agenda of hate induced persecution and entrapment, with their version of the targeted “al-Hakim Muslim Ban”! 

Targeted “al-Hakim Muslim Ban, ”FIXING CASES” in Furtherance of Corruption Agenda

The judges, clerks and court administration has been and are “fixing” cases against al-Hakim attempting to protect the opposition as they have scheduled proceedings DEMANDING the hearing be on a date al-Hakim can NOT attend due to religious commitments that has been known to the defendants and the court for over 30 years, while REFUSING to have those proceedings on a date al-Hakim can attend, yet!

If it is NOT possible to have litigation with the schedule proposed when the court is open EVERYDAY, the time is free and the court is paid to be there, then bigotry, Islamophobia, and Xenophobia are the specious basis for this continued GRAND CORRUPTION, Manipulation of the record and Register of Actions; Obstruction of Justice, Conduct To Pervert or Obstruct Justice, or the Due Administration of the Laws (Pen.Code, §§ 182, subd. (a)(1), 4570) 1 and Conspiracy to Pervert or Obstruct Justice (§ 182, subd. (a)(5)); the continued Fraud Upon The Court by Judge Brand regarding Motions clearly have a double standard! al-Hakim’s Religion and religious obligations on those days are NOT going to change for judge Brand nor the court.

al-Hakim has had to make multiple requests, once THIRTEEN times, another SEVEN TIMES to have a “Reservation Number to File a Noticed Motion and Ex-Parte motion to be heard on the SAME DATE as litigation previously scheduled, yet the requests were IGNORED/DENIED, and one resulted in the issuing of a default against al-Hakim by scheduling dates that the defendants and the court were aware al-Hakim was unavailable to attend.

The court has failed and refused to respond with their scheduling seeking an uncontested order, thereby making their agenda of hate apparent to all! 

The judges and court administration’s continuing criminal harassment, obstruction of justice, denial of due process and corruption in his uniquely applied and enforced court rules summarily denies al-Hakim’s rights to a fair hearing without any statutory or contractual basis authorizing such a ruling and places an intolerable burden on him, denying his legitimate and undeniable rights and strikes at the heart of his fundamental civil rights and due process under the law, guaranteed by the United States Constitution and California Constitution. No statute in California authorizes the court to deny a right that is uncontroverted while in the process denying such precious fundamental rights of due process and justice. The use of judicial power to permit such injustice raises significant legal questions, and an order is necessary to prevent this abuse.

The judges mindless denials further expose and demonstrate the courts agenda of judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities criminal corruption and persecution, fixing cases against al-Hakim because he is Muslim  and Black, a Whistleblower!; appointing themselves a Real Primary Party of Interest to the litigation with their OWN agenda; weaponizing vindictive rulings in furtherance of their agenda; engaging in the defense of opposing parties; the denial of due process, obstruction of justice, the harassment, provocation, and government sponsored terror, the gross examples of white class and privileged bias, prejudice, Islamophobia, Xenophobia, hate induced, vindictive, retaliatory agenda, favoritism, bigotry and racism, al-Hakim continues to experience with the courts retaliation against plaintiff by taking adverse judicial and legal actions against him as punishment of al-Hakim, his family, businesses, and communities they serve continue.

The courts have began a THIRD attempt in six months at deeming al-Hakim a vexatious litigant to foreclose on his civil rights to eliminate any further threat he poses to their “honor” and position, while denying al-Hakim any opportunity for truth, fair relief, and justice against them in the “legal system”! The court has heeded al-Hakim’s intentions to not only litigate his cases but some directly involve the corruption naming judges dating back 35 years and the courts can not afford nor will they allow this to happen! They will shut down al-Hakim at ALL COST!

I have filed multiple complaints for years against Presiding Justice Barbara Jones and Justices Burns, Humes, Bruiniers, Margulies,Kline, and Banke as well as Challenges for Cause against Associate Justice James Richman and Henry Needham, Jr. whom apparently sit in this group but has not openly participated in the decisions.

I have filed multiple complaints for years against California Supreme Court Chief Justice Tani Cantil-Sakauye, former Chief Justice Ronald M. George, Federal Chief District Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton, and former Chief District Judge Claudia Wilken also. 

In these matters, it has been established and admitted that there has been illicit ex parte collusion and conspiracy between Superior Court judges Wynne Carvill, Kim Colwell, Jeff Brand, Robert Freedman, Frank Roesch, Stephan Kaus, Mike Markman, Don Clay, Stephan Pulido, Ioana Petrou, Yolanda Northridge, Morris Jacobson, Jon Rolefson, Evelio Grillo, Kevin Murphy, Jo-Lynne Lee, Scott Patton, David Krashna, Jennifer Madden, Sue Alexander,  Glenn Oleon, George Hernandez, Tara Desautels, Leo Dorado, Dennis Hayashi, Julia Spain, several commissioners, and the Superior Court Administration of Chad Finke and the Appeals court with the judges mentioned above. Three of the judges have offered the same unsolicited.

These superior court judges have conspired with the appellant courts to independently take it upon themselves to broadcast their “dog whistle signal to the appeals court” to deny al-Hakim’s petition and issue orders in their support forcing al-Hakim into the “WRIT RACKET”! This is NOT having a trial, this is being “railroaded by the court in a case that is ALREADY fixed against you!”

This action are part of what litigants have come to know as the “WRIT RACKET” instituted by the legal system, judges, courts, the judicial administrative and regulatory agencies, both State and Federal! 

These entities have made such a mockery of justice that now these judges do not hesitate to deny or violate a litigants rights and defy them to file a writ knowing that the Supreme Court, Appeals Court, Superior Court Administration, the Judicial Council, and the Commission on Judicial Performance, will cover up and white-wash their criminal activity! These criminal justices are forcing appellants into the Appeals Court cemetery for civil rights, where the Rule of Law is Overruled and Outlawed, the death of due process, where justice is a miscarriage, the treason of truth, the homicide of human rights, the dumpster for denial, where litigants rights are banished to rot in oppression, and die!

al-Hakim’s legal opponents, CSAA and others are engaged in corruption and conspired, consorted, colluded, conceived and employing this “WRIT RACKET” criminal entrapment defense litigation strategy with third parties, other judicial, governmental, law enforcement and legal entities employees, associates, members, agents, contractors, and informants of the U. S. Attorney General- Northern California, Homeland Security (NSA), F.B.I., U. S. Federal Court- Northern California District, California State Supreme Court, California State Appeals Court, Governor of California, California Attorney General, Alameda County District Attorney, Oakland City Attorney, California State Senator, California Congressperson, Alameda County Supervisors, Mayor of Oakland, Oakland City Councilpersons, Alameda County Superior Court, Judicial Council of California, among others, inciting the courts acrimony, animus, and persecution of al-Hakim with judicial calumny deceit!

To understand the “WRIT RACKET”, one needs to know what a “racket” and “racketeering” mean and depict in the legal community and population at large. The definitions are:

Racket

“A racket is a planned or organized criminal act, usually in which the criminal act is a form of business or a way to earn illegal or extorted money regularly or briefly but repeatedly. A racket is often a repeated or continuous criminal operation.”

Racketeering

“Racketeering, often associated with organized crime, is the act of offering of a dishonest service (a “racket”) to solve a problem that wouldn’t otherwise exist without the enterprise offering the service. Racketeering as defined by the RICO act includes a list of 35 crimes.”

Moreover, this is exactly what the judges meant by their “dog whistle” signal/statement at the hearings that they would rely on their “colleagues (in the Appeals Court)” to support their decision to ignore the Rule of Law knowing that the appellate judges would do just as Jones, Burns, Bruiniers, Margulies, Kline, Humes and Banke did, “cover-up for them”.

Government Commandeered and Absconded with Plaintiff’s ENTIRE SERVER

These elements of Government working with al-Hakim’s VPS web host has engaged in censorship while commandeering and absconding with our ENTIRE VPS SERVER inspired by religious bigotry, religious discrimination, Islamophobia, Xenophobia with actions on the part of a defendant and the courts because of our exposing the judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities criminal corruption and persecution, and  Fixing Cases against al-Hakim because he is Muslim  and Black, a Whistleblower!

They are blocking our access to our commercial server WHM and multiple cPanels administration, our VPS web server, our logins to All services, ALL incoming and outgoing email, websites and website traffic in an effort to censor, suppress, conceal, and shut down our exposing the corruption of the courts and others, thereby covering up their criminal acts!

They have destroyed ALL the businesses Aaron & Margaret Wallace Foundation hosts websites entities Superstar Management, The Genius of Randy Wallace, Inc., Nowtruth, eX-whY Adventures, CAECAY and their websites: Amwftrust.org, Superstarmanagement.com, Ex-Why.com, Nowtruth.org, Greencleanascene.com, Nobooksnoballsports.org, Steppingto.org, Bawha.com, DrKenya.net, Fightfordrghosh.org, CAECAY.org, Nstrongharmony.org; ALL their email address accounts; propriety email list Futurist, MWBE, Newsalert, NIA, Superstars, Act, Lawaid, Politicos, AMWF, Super Bowl Guest, Entrepreneur, and SJA!

They have shut down ALL our Twitter accounts: @ajalil, @FirstSSM, @Nowtruth1, @EXWHYAD, @griotz, @AMWFND, @electionwin, and @caecay.

They have shut down our social media presence to silence our voice exposing their criminal activity along with that of the Alameda County Superior Court Administration, Alameda County District Attorney, City of Oakland and their City Attorney, California Attorney General, Governor Jerry Brown, Senator Kamala Harris, and others.

Government Covertly Planted SpyWare on al-Hakim’s Company Computer

On June 17, 2018, al-Hakim found SpyWare covertly planted on al-Hakim’s company computer through his web browser when he logged into his Interserver and U. S. Courts account.

SpyWare is programed to take control of your camera and microphone, to spy on their Computer Activities, Instant Message, Chats, Software usage, Take Screenshots Remotely, See File Transfers, Capture Key logs, Spy on Media Files, Spy on Emails, Spy on Browser Activities, monitor your workplace or home remotely, notify them if it detects your computers activities, including an alarm system, a recording system, and sending screengrabs of your PC or mobile phone. The SpyWare can connect to multiple IP cameras and microphones, then automatically starts recording whenever it captures motion and enable live remote viewing from any PC.

It’s a terrifying invasion of privacy that defendants with government agencies like the NSA can take control of the webcam and microphone on your computer and spy on you without your knowledge.

Previously, censorship had been implemented by them by blocking and blacklisting plaintiffs servers IP’s, device IP’s, domain IP’s, email addresses with accomplices SORBS, SpamHaus, RBL, SURBL, Mailchannels, Trouble-Free.net, Barracuda, ABUSE.NET, Exploits Bot List (XBL), AbuseIPDB, Invaluement, MXToolBox, MultiRBL, URIBL, SURBL, Composite Blocking List (CBL), Passive Spam Block List (PSBL), with reverse DNS verifications, DNSBL blocks, surveilled email content, censored email content, blocked or throttled email distribution as Internet filters, firewalls, Internet blocking, DNS poisoning, and Internet zoning.  It is currently used by some organizations and governments to control the content viewed by individuals accessing Web pages over the Internet. The largest complaint about Internet censorship is that it ignores free-speech rights and violates the civil liberties of Internet users.

That censorship along with AMWF’s server and hosted websites being intentionally mis-configured by defendants it is causing the many, many, over 40 years of creating a brand, establishing goodwill, proprietary client email list and email distribution to those lists, clients intellectual property, trade secrets, clients data, content, website service pages, articles, posts, videos, podcasts, features, photos, marketing, promotion, testimonials, social media, email lists, simple inter-company and inter-office email communications, the theft and missing proprietary client email list, the theft and missing clients intellectual property, the theft and missing clients trade secrets, the theft and missing clients data, links to partner websites (blogroll), thousands of broken links prevent access to all these features via website visits, search engines, and by blocking web IP’s, server IP’s, device (computers, phones, tablets, etc.) IP’s, email addresses, ALL INTERNET CONNECTED AND RELATED COMMUNICATIONS AND DEVICES, referrals, from ALL the above mentioned sources, for all intents and purposes, burying the business.

This prevented employees, volunteers, clients, donors, donees, subscribers, users, contributors, and visitors from accessing the site, services, articles, posts, videos, photos, events calendar, information, fundraising efforts, advertising, special events, marketing, promotions, special offers, acknowledgement, individual and group discussion, town hall meetings, online forms for FREE tickets to entertainment events, to join the mail list, to be a subscriber, to become a member, submit a special request for services, for FREE educational opportunities and assistance, for FREE rental assistance, for FREE food, for FREE clothing, for FREE computers, for FREE housing, for FREE medical services, for FREE legal services, for FREE home and cell phones, fundraising donations, for volunteering, Inter-Faith and Multi-Cultural events, for FREE Youth resources, for FREE employment opportunities and assistance, for FREE resources and assistance, for FREE Autism resources and assistance, for FREE homeless resources and assistance, for FREE proprietary videos, CD’s and podcasts, to purchase proprietary videos, CD’s and podcasts, for FREE clinics and health centers, client proprietary videos, partner proprietary videos, selected educational/information proprietary videos, and sharing the above.

al-Hakim’s “court activities”, in the last 40 years al-Hakim has documented, filed and served court actions, filed and served complaints and filed and served correspondence memorializing and exposing the judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities criminal corruption and persecution, Fixing Cases against al-Hakim because he is Muslim  and Black, a Whistleblower!; appointing themselves a Real Primary Party of Interest to the litigation with their OWN agenda; weaponizing vindictive rulings in furtherance of their agenda; engaging in the defense of opposing parties; the denial of due process, obstruction of justice, the harassment, provocation, and government sponsored terror, the gross examples of white class and privileged bias, prejudice, Islamophobia, Xenophobia, hate induced, vindictive, retaliatory agenda, favoritism, bigotry and racism, al-Hakim continues to experience with the courts retaliation against plaintiff by taking adverse judicial and legal actions against him as punishment of al-Hakim, his family, businesses, and communities they serve continue to suffer at their individual and collective gavels and authorities.

al-Hakim proves where charges has shown that previously, under color of law, these judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities criminal corruption and persecution sought to deprive plaintiff of litigation due him contrary to the right to due process and immunity from takings without due process is a gross abuse of discretion in violation of the law that will violate plaintiff’s rights guaranteed under the First, Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution; First Clause of Section 13 of Article I of California Constitution, art. VI, § 4 1/2; California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 355, 356, 473, 475; Civ. Code, §§ 3523, 3528.

Some of those Co-Defendants Equinix and Interserver referenced in their reply, ALL of whom have been complained of or to are, in major part because al-Hakim reported the very obvious agenda of parties by memorializing and exposing the judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal  entities corruption and persecution and their involvement in the cover-up of that criminal corruption.

al-Hakim’s viewpoints, are protected speech under the California Constitution. The court harassed al-Hakim by engaging in a severe and pervasive scheme to suppress his constitutional and statutory right to engage in protected activity, by threatening him with and by executing against him punitive and adverse judicial actions, including delay and termination of his basic rights to due process. The court created, tolerated and condoned a court environment that is pervasively hostile to al-Hakim on account of viewpoints he holds regarding religion, politics and whistleblowing activities. The court failed and refused to remedy this hostile environment, and permitted al-Hakim to be harassed by both administrators and co-workers on account of his viewpoints. The court has engaged in an ongoing and continuous course of harassment based on al-Hakim’s protected rights under the California Constitution.

The conduct of various judges and the court as alleged in this Challenge are sufficiently pervasive to alter the terms and conditions of litigation and the legal, judicial and court environment such that it created a hostile environment, hostile to the al-Hakim.

The unlawful conduct alleged was engaged in by various judges and the court, supervisors and/or managing agents of the judges and the court and/or who were acting at all times relevant within the scope and course of their employment. The court are, therefore, strictly liable for the conduct of said agents and employees.

al-Hakim is informed, believes, and based thereon alleges that these judges and the court MUST accept that they have taken a sworn oath to uphold the Constitution of the United States of America and the State of California, while some judges has lied and perjured themselves in WRITING, casting off any remote semblance of honor or integrity that anyone present could respect, has enacted his personal agenda to persecute me and deny my rights under the aforementioned Constitutions, whom along with the judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities and the court acted with malice, criminal corruption and persecution as described herein with reckless disregard for al-Hakim’s rights and/or with the intent to injure, vex, annoy and harass al-Hakim, and subjected al-Hakim to cruel and unjust hardship in conscious disregard of al-Hakim’s rights with the intention of causing al-Hakim injury and depriving him of his constitutional rights.

This appears to be the process enacted by Presiding Judge Barbara J. R. Jones with the order from the Appeals Court dated July 16, 2018, dismissing the above action due to an “unopposed” June 22, 2018, motion to dismiss filed by Defendant-Respondent, CSAA- Wellpoint Asset Recovery LLC that we have complained of for months!

Entire “Illegal” Proceedings are Grand, Systemic and Endemic Corruption

These entire “illegal proceedings” are solely for the purpose of the unscrupulous judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities illegally utilizing the full force and resources of the government in a covert criminal undercover sting operation by fostering, fabricating and manipulating any argument, testimony, documents, word, inference, vague reference, or gesture that they can remotely interpret as evidence of any remote action they seek to advocate to incriminate, charge, try, convict, incarcerate and eliminate al-Hakim!

These are cases that al-Hakim has filed, they are his cases, NOT the courts, nor judges, nor law enforcement, nor government, nor legal entities in power! Yet they have hijacked al-Hakim, his religion, his truth, his family; their home, their lives; their personal, real, and business property; his businesses; his community; those they serve; his cases; his rights; his freedom; his pursuit of happiness; justice; the Constitution; his very existence! 

This Grand corruption is systemic and endemic in ALL al-Hakim cases involves the unscrupulous judicial, law enforcement, governmental and legal entities in power colluding and conspiring using the judicial arm of government whom perform and serve in the roles as suspect, culprit, criminal, evidence, testimony, facts, truth, perjury, investigator, witness, defendant, conspirators, corruptors, colluders, judge, jury, executioner, as the opposition party with their agenda of criminal corruption and persecution to the detriment and oppression of al-Hakim.

This grand, systemic and endemic corruption is the abuse of power, office, and resources by judicial, political, law enforcement, governmental or legal entities and officials for organizational and personal gain, with and by the herein listed tactics. It also takes the form of these judicial, political, law enforcement, governmental or legal entities office holders maintaining themselves in office by their agenda of criminal corruption and persecution illegally utilizing the full force and resources of the government in a covert criminal undercover sting operation to the detriment and oppression of al-Hakim with use taxpayers’ money.

Judges do not have discretion not to disqualify themselves. By law, they are bound to follow the law. Should a judge not disqualify himself as required by law, then the judge has given another example of his “appearance of partiality” which further disqualifies the judge. al-Hakim again renews the request for those affected Judges to disqualify themselves, ALL of them, including ALL those named herein.

Thank you in advance for your thoughtful consideration.

 

Respectfully,

Abdul-Jalil

510-394-4501

RE: ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

TO: Phyllis J. Hamilton- Chief District Judge
Claudia Wilken- District Judge
Yvonne Gonzalez Rodgers- Judge
U. S. District Court- No. Division
4th Floor Oakland Courthouse
1301 Clay Street
Oakland, CA 94612
FAX No.: 510-637-3545, 415-522-3605
Phyllis_Hamilton@cand.uscourts.gov
Claudia_Wilken@cand.uscourts.gov
Yvonne_Rodgers@cand.uscourts.gov

cc: Susan Y. Soong ; bcc
Faxed and Emailed
FROM: Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim
DATE: March 13, 2019 
NO PAGES: 3
RE: ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS, Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim v. Green Key Investments L.L.C., Case: #C19-0303 JSC,

Dear Chief Justice Phyllis Hamilton, Judge Claudia Wilken, and Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rodgers:

On March 11, 2019, I received a second order from Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rodgers 

regrading the filing of another “revised application” as follows:

The Court is in receipt of plaintiffs four-page letter dated February 27, 2019. (Dkt. No 14.) Therein, plaintiff appears to complain that the Court is requesting confirmation of his status with respect to his application to proceed in forma pauperis. While the Court is quite aware of the financial circumstances of many in this District, that does not mean that the Court can ignore its duty to ensure that those asking for financial relief provide an explanation, under penalty of perjury, regarding their financial situation. Judge Corley appropriately described the gaps with respect to the information provided, which this Court reiterated in its subsequent order. (See Dkt. No.6, 13.) It is not clear why plaintiff refuses to respond substantively. Plaintiff may submit the information confidentially if that is the concern.” 

It goes on to state:

All parties are required to comply with Court orders and rules. Accordingly, the Court will EXTEND, one last time, plaintiff’s deadline to Tuesday, April 2, 2019 to submit a revised application, or enough supplemental information to explain the information gaps set forth in Judge Corley’s and this Court’s orders.’ If plaintiff does not use the Court’s application itself but provides further information in a different form, he is reminded to include the following: “I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and understand that a false statement herein may result in the dismissal of my claims.”
Failure to provide the Court with the information requested will result in the denial of plaintiff s application. 

IT Is So ORDERED.

Dated: March 7, 2019 

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE 

It provides as a footnote the “relevant” paragraph from Judge Corley’s order:

Although Plaintiff has listed himself as self-employed, he appears to have listed his income as 00. Further, although he does not list any other income nor any savings nor debt, he identifies his monthly expenditures as $300.00 for utilities. Plaintiff does not indicate any monthly expenses for rent, food, or clothing. Thus, there appear to be several information gaps on Plaintiffs in forma pauperis application. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall submit a revised application by February 7, 2019. If Plaintiff fails to submit a revised application by this date, his application to proceed in forma pauperis may be denied. 

(Order re: IFP Application at ECF p. 1 (emphasis supplied).) To date, plaintiff has failed to comply with Judge Corley’s order, and the “information gaps” in his in forma pauperis application remain.

Accordingly, the Court EXTENDS plaintiffs deadline to submit a revised application to Tuesday, March 5, 2019. Failure to submit a revised application by this date may result in the denial of his application.

IT Is So ORDERED. 

Dated: February 19, 2019 

YVONNE GONZALEZ ROGERS

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE  

The original form was submitted under the penalty of perjury, if that was/is the concern, and to be absolutely clear, so is this second letter addressing the same issues raised in the first order, the “flagging” of certain alleged deficiencies as “information gaps” in plaintiffs pending application to proceed in forma pauperis is without any merit and the responses remain the same.

I reiterate in use of your language “Plaintiff listed his income as 00, does not list any other income nor any savings nor debt, he identifies his monthly expenditures as $300.00 for utilities, and does not indicate any monthly expenses for rent, food, or clothing” because that is true and correct and will not change simply because you do not like the answer fishing for another.

These statements ARE sworn under the penalty of perjury, and are NOT impeached because you threaten to dismiss the matter in search of some fraudulent or perjurious information that you could be considered “forcing” upon plaintiff under that “one last time” threat and the accompanying duress.

There is NO need nor requirement, beside the one fabricated here to induce a “revised application, or enough supplemental information” solely for that purpose.

The only legal question is “does plaintiff meet that criterion that is ruled by the financial requirements for IFP status of 28 U.S.C. § 1915?

The esoteric blather about the Legal Help Center, which I have contacted and they can not and do not assist in these matters, is just that.

Again, how does this means of obtaining a filing fee waiver REALLY impact ones ability to represent themselves which is suppose to be the purpose of the form?

It is very disconcerting that the court has taken the approach to this case that it has at present and clearly was embarked upon an agenda that reeks of implicit bias and prejudice, at the very least, already!

As previously mentioned, I will address the previous assignment of this matter by the alleged Executive Committee to Judge Tigar in a following letter as it is unfathomable, heinous, reprehensible, disgraceful, inexcusable, unconscionable, outrageous, nefarious example of “MALFEASANCE”

Who comprises this alleged Executive Committee?

You are ALL being served and I will file this letter with the courts.

Call if you have any questions, and “Thank you” for your consideration.

Respectfully,

I declare under the penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and understand that a false  statement herein may result in the dismissal of my claims.

Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim

510-394-4501

Complaint against Trustees Tracy Hope Davis and Martha Bronitsky,Violation of the 1, 5th, 6th, 8th, and 14h Amend U. S. Constitution; California Constitution

TO:  CLIFFORD J. WHITE III, DIRECTOR
RAMONA D. ELLIOTT, DEPUTY DIRECTOR/GENERAL COUNSEL
LISA A. TRACY, DEPUTY GENERAL COUNSEL
WILLIAM T. NEARY, ACTING DEPUTY DIRECTOR FOR FIELD OPERATIONS
TIFFANY CARROLL, ACTING ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR OVERSIGHT
THOMAS E. BAIR, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR ADMINISTRATION
441 G STREET, NW, SUITE 6150
WASHINGTON, DC 20530
Fax: 202-307-0672, Fax: 202-307-2397, Fax: 202-616-4576, Fax: 202-307-3960

Tracy Hope Davis                                        Xavier Becerra
Office of the United States Trustee          Attorney General of California
450 Golden Gate Ave,Ste #05-0153        1300 I Street, Suite 125
P.O. Box 944255                                         Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
San Francisco, CA 94102                           FAX No.: 916-324-8835
Fax: 415-705-3379, 705-3367                 Xavier.Becerra@doj.ca.gov
Tracy.Davis@usdoj.gov                              Peter.Southworth@doj.ca.gov
Tracy.Davis2@usdoj.gov                           Robert.Wilson@doj.ca.gov

Alex Tse                                         Phyllis J. Hamilton
Director- No. District                    Chief District Judge
U. S. Attorney’s Office                  U. S. District Court- No. Division
Federal Courthouse                      6th Floor Oakland Courthouse- 2
450 Golden Gate Avenue             1301 Clay Street
San Francisco, CA 94102             Oakland, CA 94612
Fax No.: 415-436-7234                FAX No.: 415-522-3605
alex.Tse@usdoj.gov                              Phyllis_Hamilton@cand.uscourts.gov
stacey.geis@usdoj.gov                         Richard_Wieking@cand.uscourts.gov
joshua.Eaton@usdoj.gov                      Joseph_Spero@cand.uscourts.gov

Chief Judge Roger L. Efrensky                  Martha G. Bronitsky
Office of the United States Trustee          Trustee
1301 Clay Street, Room 690N                    P.O. Box 5004
Oakland, CA 94612                                      Hayward, CA 94540
Fax: 510-637-3220                                      Fax: 510-266-5589
Roger_Efrensky@cand.uscourts.gov          vsilveira@oak13.com

Travis Poole                                          Mick Mulvaney
Travelling Mailbox.com                        Director
500 Westover Dr.                                 The Office of Management and Budget
Sanford, NC 27330                              725 17th Street, NW
Fax: 800-991-2996                             Washington, DC 20503
support@travellingmailbox.com         Fax: 202-395-3888, John.M.Mulvaney@omb.eop.gov

Wendy Kamenshine
Ombudsman
Consumer Finance Protection Bureau
1700 G St. N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20552
Fax: 855-237-2392
CFPBOmbudsman@cfpb.gov

Tom Pahl                                                   Alex Padilla
Director                                                     California Secretary of State
Bureau of Consumer Protection            1500 11th St., Room 390
Federal Trade Commission                     Sacramento CA 95814
600 Pennsylvania Ave., NW                    Fax: 916-653-4795
Washington, DC 20580                           alex.padilla@sos.ca.gov
Fax: 202-326-3799
tpahl@ftc.gov, RMazer@ftc.gov

Selvi Stanislaus                                            David J. Gau
Executive Officer                                          Executive Director
Franchise Tax Board                                    Board of Equalization
PO Box 115                                                    450 N St., Room 2322, MIC:73
Rancho Cordova CA 95741-0115               Sacramento CA 95814
Fax: 916-845-9048, 916-843-6022,        Fax No. 916-324-2586,
916-845-6614, 916-843-2060                 David.Gau@boe.ca.gov
Criminal Investigation Bureau (CIB)                           Brenda.Fleming@boe.ca.gov
Fax: 916-227-2798
cc: Clerk Edward J. Emmons ; bcc
Faxed and Emailed
FROM:     Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim
DATE:     August 24, 2018
NO PAGES: 22
RE:        Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim’s Complaint against Trustees Tracy Hope Davis and Martha Bronitsky, Bankruptcy Case: #18-41048 RLE in violation of the rights guaranteed under 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(4); Fraud On The Court- Federal Code 60 (Code Civ. Proc. §473 et seq. and §594 et seq.); Violation of the First, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment U. S. Constitution; California Constitution by the first clause of Article I, section 13;  Article VI, section 4 1/2; Article VI, section 13, as a “miscarriage of justice.”; Article VI, section 18, subd. (d)(3.) and under the Unruh and Ralph Civil Rights and the Bane Acts.

Dear Clifford J. White III, Ramona D. Elliott, Lisa A. Tracy, William T. Neary, Tiffany Carroll, Thomas E. Bair, Tracy Hope Davis, Chief District Judge Phyllis J. Hamilton, Chief Judge Roger L. Efrensky, Alex Tse, Xavier Becerra, and Martha Bronitsky:

Herein is Debtor Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim Formal Complaint against Trustees Tracy Hope Davis and Martha Bronitsky.

I recently filed a Motion to Vacate and Set Aside the In Rem Order of Judge William Lafferty, Case No.:18-41048, of May 21, 2018, per 11 U.S.C. § 362(d)(4); Fraud On The Court- Federal Code 60 (Code Civ. Proc. §473 et seq. and §594 et seq.); Violation of the First, Fifth, Sixth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendment U. S. Constitution; California Constitution by the first clause of Article I, section 13;  Article VI, section 4 1/2; Article VI, section 13, as a “miscarriage of justice.”; Article VI, section 18, subd. (d)(3.) and under the Unruh and Ralph Civil Rights and the Bane Acts.

I am the Debtor in this case and filed a Voluntary Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Petition on July 26, 2018, Case No.:18-41718, and it was assigned to Martha Bronitsky as Trustee.
On May 3, 2018, I filed a petition with Case No.:18-41048 wherein there was the In Rem hearing on May 16, 2018, at 9:30 a.m. before Judge William Lafferty. The In Rem Order was granted on May 21, 2018, and case was dismissed hours later on May 22, 2018.

I had previously filed on March 8, 2018, Case: #18-40567 and was assigned Chief Judge Roger L. Efrensky. That case was dismissed on March 23, 2018.

Each time I filed the Chapter 13, it was assigned to Martha Bronitsky whom I have filed and served six (6) letters and complaints in the last few months alone addressing the fact that Ms. Bronitsky’s presence in this case is prohibitive and I have resolved that since she has embezzled money from me and previously issued me checks drawn on her business account that have bounced for insufficient funds and others that had stopped payments applied to them of $9,889.04, I do not feel comfortable going forward with her as a trustee.

Again, we want ALL of you served with this attached 22 page complaint against against Trustees Tracy Hope Davis and Martha Bronitsky and for an investigation request related to the existence and collection of the alleged debt by Wellpoint, counsel Bradley with Hammett and Lanni that the government has found was illegal and may void the alleged debt. Lanni has admitted that he tried for years to recover on an illegal alleged debt that included his attempt to sell the home in question several times as an alleged “foreclosure” on the Oakland courthouse steps and as part of this strategy to bring value to the illegal alleged debt, he offered a predatory loan to attempt to move into “first position” with a new mortgage to cover the alleged $300,000 CSAA debt and $130,000 for the illegal alleged debt. He did this even AFTER he was aware that the government agencies were trying to apprehend him for these illegal activities.

This complaint and investigation request include the fraud upon the court that defendants CSAA-Wellpoint committed when they failed and refused to reveal the fact that they were aware of the Homestead on the property, the value of the District Attorney liens on the property, and the contamination in the home TWENTY YEARS BEFORE their alleged home appraisal yet there is NO reference to any contamination in it as if it would NOT have any value in determining the fair market value of that appraisal. This fraud upon the court is very clear when they knew that their own experts testified that it would cost over $350,000 to remediate just the lower level of the home in 1997! CSAA’s costs for the entire home was $700,000.

You are ALL being served and I will file this letter with the courts.

Respectfully,

Abdul-Jalil al-Hakim
510-394-4501

  • Calendar of Posts

    July 2020
    S M T W T F S
     1234
    567891011
    12131415161718
    19202122232425
    262728293031  
  • Purchase SUPERSTAR MANAGEMENT Lecture Series

    Lecture Series Purchase Prices
    Lecture Series Discount Offer $50.00 USD Lecture Series CD Special $99.00 USD Lecture Series DVD Special $149.00 USD Lecture Series CD Standard Discount $199.00 USD Lecture Series DVD Standard Discount $399.00 USD Lecture Series CD Standard $450.00 USD Lecture Series DVD Standard $750.00 USD
  • RSS Abdul-Jalil Lecture Series

    • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
  • Please Support AMWFT Efforts with Your Secure Paypal Sponsorship Donation

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 3 other followers

  • SUPERSTARMANAGEMENT’S iTUNES Podcast’s

  • ABC-TV Breaking News

    [clearspring_widget title="abc7news.com: news, weather & video" wid="4921ce44d2cc0f1e" pid="4a4c63c6d26c3e46" width="304" height="254" domain="widgets.clearspring.com"]
  • Now Truth! Twitter Roll